Status:
Tags: beliefs philosophy
Objective truth is locked beyond human access.
Most arguments are different interpretations of the same data
I’d believe in a universal truth, when it comes to the natural world. But as soon as human nature is involved in your computation it gets subjective to interpretation.
“Objective truth” exists, but human access to it is majorly limited
and how much does it really matter? Humans are not creatures of truth. We are creatures of story.
Perhaps it is in this “Mathematical sense” for physics to be the only field in which objective truth can be found. It’s got a language of equations and maths.
Even that language has its impossibilities
Who’s to ever say biology and history arent buckets with its own ridiculousness.